Health British Columbia

Ben Woodfinden: A Tory MP wants easier access to magic mushrooms. Hear him out

It is worth letting doctors prescribe psilocybin for end-of-life depression

Ben Woodfinden: A Tory MP wants easier access to magic mushrooms. Hear him out
Text to audio Audio version available

It is worth letting doctors prescribe psilocybin for end-of-life depression

A few days before Parliament rose for its summer recess, Saskatchewan MP Corey Tochor tabled a private member’s bill (C-286) that would loosen federal law to let doctors prescribe drugs containing psilocybin for depression, particularly end-of-life depression, and fast-track the regulatory approval of those drugs. You may not have heard of psilocybin, but you have probably heard of magic mushrooms, the fungi it comes from. And you might be wondering why on earth a Conservative MP, from a party that has taken tough stances on drugs in recent years, is tabling a bill to loosen access to a controlled substance.

What, you might ask, is this MP smoking (or taking)? But get your laughs out now. Private member’s bills rarely become law, and most never make it through the legislative process at all, but this one is a serious piece of work, and when the House returns on September 21 it deserves a proper look from members of every party.

Before getting into the substance (pun intended), it is worth being clear about what the bill is not. C-286 is a narrow medical measure. It does not legalize psychedelics for the wider population or for recreational use.

It amends two statutes, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Food and Drugs Act, moving psilocybin and its cousin psilocin out of the most restricted tier and into the framework that already lets doctors prescribe controlled drugs, while directing Health Canada to fast-track related drug submissions. Recommended Videos It is named for Thomas Hartle, who is not around to lobby for it. Hartle was a father in Saskatoon, diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer in 2016, and in 2020 was the first Canadian granted a legal exemption to take psilocybin, which he used against the dread of knowing how his story ended.

It helped him where the antidepressants had not. Then the exemption lapsed, and the renewals dragged (one request sat 511 days before Health Canada said no), and a dying man spent strength he could not spare flying to the Caribbean for a treatment that made his last months bearable. He died in 2024, at 56.

“The state will help you end your life but won’t grant you legal access to a plant that is non-toxic and non-addictive,” Tochor said. He is right. Parliament found the time, not long ago, to widen the door to assisted death; unsticking a mushroom that kills no one has apparently been harder.

The state made dying on request reasonably quick and made this a years-long fight, and Hartle ran out of years. Psilocybin was not invented in labs by humans looking to turn human dependency into profit. It is natural substance with a long history across civilizations.

It grows in dozens of wild mushroom species, and people have been eating those mushrooms to alter their minds for thousands of years. The Aztecs called them teonanácatl, “flesh of the gods,” and used them in rites that Spanish missionaries tried to wipe from the record. None of that proves the drug works.

But it makes the panic over a mushroom look a little ridiculous. Psilocybin produces no physical dependence, and the body builds tolerance so quickly that a second day’s dose barely registers, which is the enemy of any habit. You cannot get hooked on it.

As one Johns Hopkins researcher dryly put it, nobody is jonesing for their next fix. Overdosing is nearly as hard: there is no established lethal dose in humans, with estimates running to perhaps a thousand times an ordinary one. The hazards are almost entirely psychological.

A dose can bring on panic or a frightening sense that the self is coming apart, the “bad trip” of popular reputation, and someone going through that alone, with no one to steady them, can end up in real danger. That is why the bill keeps psilocybin in a clinic, under a doctor, rather than turning it loose.

So how does it work? Once swallowed, psilocybin converts to psilocin, which latches onto a serotonin receptor that sits thickly across the cortex and, in effect, turns down a brain circuit called the default-mode network. Think of that network as the brain’s self-absorbed narrator, the running inner monologue that, in depression, gets stuck on one bleak loop and will not switch off.

Quiet the narrator and the experience can be strange and overwhelming. People describe the edges of the self softening, emotions arriving with unusual force, old griefs surfacing to be looked at squarely, a sense of connection to other people and the world that the illness had shut down. Inside the skull, regions that normally keep to themselves start comparing notes, and a single dose appears to set off a burst of rewiring that outlasts the drug, the kind no daily pill produces and, if we are honest, the kind nobody has fully explained.

One afternoon, and the prescription is finished. For a substance the state treats as dangerous, the evidence that it helps is surprisingly strong, and growing. Depression has the strongest case behind it, along with the end-of-life distress that was Hartle’s own.

Controlled trials in JAMA Psychiatry and the New England

Source and reference

Journal of Medicine report fast, sometimes lasting relief, even in patients who had failed everything else. Early work on addiction, the street-drug epidemic Tochor keeps invoking, is encouraging. PTSD is shakier. Veterans like Josh Veinotte, who appeared alongside Tochor, say it helped with trauma nothing else had touched, though the formal evidence is less conclusive and stays preliminary. For Alzheimer’s the science is younger still, one small Hopkins study of depression in early dementia. And the doubts are fair. It is hard to blind a trial when patients can feel the drug working, the field has a habit of getting ahead of its evidence, and a promising result is a long way from a pharmacy shelf. All the more reason to put it under scrutiny. So when the House comes back, send this bill to committee so it can be studied, experts can testify on various sides, and our legislators can...

Read original source
Published
Jul 11, 2026
Updated
Jul 11, 2026
Source
National Post
Category
Health
Read time
5 min
Key facts

Key facts

SectionHealth
Open
SourceNational Post
Open
PublishedJul 11, 2026
UpdatedJul 11, 2026

Why this matters locally

This health story matters locally because it may affect readers, businesses, commuters, families, or public services in British Columbia.

Local impact

BC Post links this item to British Columbia coverage so readers can follow related city updates, weather, traffic, events, and category news in one place.

Timeline

PublishedJul 11, 2026, 3:00 AMThis story was published by BC Post.
ImportedJul 11, 2026, 11:00 PMThe item entered the BC Post source pipeline.
UpdatedJul 11, 2026, 11:00 PMThe article record or local context was updated.
Transparency

Source and credit

BC Post may summarize, organize, and add local context for reader clarity. Original reporting remains with the listed publisher.

National Post Published Jul 11, 2026 Imported Jul 11, 2026
Read Original Source
National Post Jul 11, 2026
Read Original Source