Environment British Columbia

City council will decide if $500 foxtail barley fines will stick

Foxtail barley can give of barbed seeds that when eaten by dogs can become lodged in their mouths

City council will decide if $500 foxtail barley fines will stick
Text to audio Audio version available

Foxtail barley can give of barbed seeds that when eaten by dogs can become lodged in their mouths

Pending a city council decision later this month, Calgarians may no longer be subject to $500 fines for failing to manage foxtail barley on their properties. Council’s community development committee voted 7-0 on Monday to remove a provision from the city’s community standards bylaw that pertained to foxtail barley, a native grass species in Calgary whose barbed seeds can harm pets, if ingested. When foxtail barley goes untreated, it unleashes barbed seeds that, if eaten by dogs, can become lodged in their mouths, potentially causing health issues or expensive vet bills.

The bylaw change in 2023 — spearheaded by former Ward 12 Coun. Evan Spencer — required the plant to be no more than eight centimetres tall on “nuisance properties,” which are defined by the city as unmaintained, unsightly properties that are causing issues for surrounding residents. Under the same bylaw, most other tall grasses are required to be kept to a maximum 15-centimetre height.

Failure to keep foxtail barley from growing out of control can currently net property owners a fine up to $500. But according to the city’s Chief bylaw officer, foxtail barley has been difficult to enforce. “Some of the challenges for our peace officers was that we’d be getting calls out to residential properties and there’d be a handful of foxtail barley plants, which I don’t think ever matched the spirit or intent of adding this into the bylaw in the first place,” said Ryan Pleckaitis, the city’s Chief of community standards, in an interview.

“That discussion in 2023 was about dealing with large infestations in developing communities. Instead, our officers were often getting calls out to deal with a few plants on a property, which probably isn’t the best use of our limited peace officer resources.” The foxtail bylaw requirement has generated a high volume of complaints for small amounts of the plant on residential properties, according to Pleckaitis, requiring significant enforcement efforts that have drawn bylaw officers away from other duties.

If council supports removing the provision later this month, administration would continue to manage foxtail barley on city-owned property and increase communication efforts to educate pet-owners on the risk the plant poses, Pleckaitis added. City not doing a good job of controlling foxtail barley, argues councillor The committee’s vote responds to a notice of motion earlier this year from Ward 2 Coun. Jennifer Wyness that sought to repeal the foxtail barley provision from the community standards bylaw.

Council supported her pitch in April. The city is often the worst offender when it comes to spreading foxtail barley, Wyness argued. Fining households for not managing the plant is hypocritical, she argued, when the city is not holding itself to the same standard.

“We were seeing seeds spread from city lands onto private property, with the expectation that private properties would be required to treat it and keep it trimmed,” she said in an interview. “We need to make sure that if a resident is going to be fined for not holding to a city standard, the city should hold to that standard as well.” Of more than 12,000 complaints for long grass and weeds last year, 1,533 pertained to foxtail barley, Wyness’s motion claimed.

But since the bylaw amendment was introduced three years ago, only one fine has been issued. And after the 2023 amendment was introduced, a city report claimed that mitigating the growth of foxtail barley on public and vacant land could cost more than $2 million annually due to the need for additional mowing cycles and site management. “I think it’s important that pet owners — especially dog owners — when you’re walking your dog, make sure they’re not eating foxtail,” she said.

“However, the city also needs to set the standard on maintenance of a native grass species before we actually put fines on Calgarians. The hypocrisy of the bylaw is why we wanted to repeal it.” Even if the $500 fine for allowing foxtail barley to proliferate is removed from the bylaw, management of the plant can fall under the city’s same rules for other tall grasses and vegetation, Wyness argued.

While some think it’s a weed, foxtail barley is a native species to Alberta and does prevent topsoil erosion, Wyness argued. The plant thrives in disturbed soils, including construction sites, roadsides, boulevards, green spaces, and parks. Due to the committee’s unanimous support, the item will be added to the consent agenda for council’s July 28 regular meeting.

Consent agenda items are bundled into one vote, meaning they’re not voted on separately unless a council member specifically requests it to be “pulled” for debate.

Published
Jul 13, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Source
Calgary Herald
Category
Environment
Read time
3 min
Key facts

Key facts

SectionEnvironment
Open
SourceCalgary Herald
Open
PublishedJul 13, 2026
UpdatedJul 13, 2026

Why this matters locally

This environment story matters locally because it may affect readers, businesses, commuters, families, or public services in British Columbia.

Local impact

BC Post links this item to British Columbia coverage so readers can follow related city updates, weather, traffic, events, and category news in one place.

Timeline

PublishedJul 13, 2026, 2:02 PMThis story was published by BC Post.
ImportedJul 13, 2026, 4:00 PMThe item entered the BC Post source pipeline.
Transparency

Source and credit

BC Post may summarize, organize, and add local context for reader clarity. Original reporting remains with the listed publisher.

Calgary Herald Published Jul 13, 2026 Imported Jul 13, 2026
Read Original Source
Calgary Herald Jul 13, 2026
Read Original Source