Politics British Columbia

Alberta Voices: The status quo in Canada can't continue

As someone who signed both petitions, I believe there is one thing that both sides actually agree on — that regardless of the path Alberta takes moving forward, the status quo cannot be part of that future. I signed bot…

Alberta Voices: The status quo in Canada can't continue
Text to audio Audio version available

As someone who signed both petitions, I believe there is one thing that both sides actually agree on — that regardless of the path Alberta takes moving forward, the status quo cannot be part of that future. I signed both not because I agreed with one or the other, but because I wanted to make [...]

As someone who signed both petitions, I believe there is one thing that both sides actually agree on — that regardless of the path Alberta takes moving forward, the status quo cannot be part of that future. I signed both not because I agreed with one or the other, but because I wanted to make sure that the issue was put to a vote. While I personally believe Alberta separation is virtually unachievable, peacefully, continuing as a province of Canada with “business as usual” is equally unacceptable.

The relationship must change. Alberta’s list of grievances is long and goes right back to the very beginning. Alberta (and Saskatchewan) were not viewed as equals but as second-tier citizens.

This is evidenced by the 1904 Minister of the Interior Clifford Sifton quote that, nowadays, most Alberta separatists can recite verbatim. “We desire, and all Canadian Patriots desire, that the great trade of the prairies shall go to enrich our people to the East, to build up our factories and our places of work, and in every legitimate way to our prosperity.” From there the litany of grievances with Ottawa grows and the previous Liberal government only threw fuel on the fire.

It’s not just about a pipeline. Pipelines are just a symbol of the pattern. It’s about policies that punish one region for votes in another: - The tanker ban isn’t a real tanker ban since it only bans oil tankers.

- What is included or omitted in the equalization formula calculation conveniently punishes one region to the benefit of another. - The government makes criminals of law-abiding gun owners across the country just so it can continue treating the actual criminals as victims and, of course, continue getting votes in two particular urban centres. - One region gets a break on home-heating carbon taxes while the rest just get shrugs.

- And could you imagine the federal government saying food prices are too high so Quebec dairy producers can no longer charge full price? Of course not, but when it came to oil, well, that was different, because it was Alberta. That right there is probably my biggest grievance.

Successive federal governments have shown no qualms about acting against Alberta’s interests in a way that it would never consider against any other province. On top of that, accommodations given — or outright offered — to some jurisdictions denied to Alberta as “unacceptable” or “un-Canadian.” Is it so much to ask that if one province is given greater authority or autonomy, that the same is given to other provinces?

Canada has been described as an asymmetric federation. Is it any wonder then that some Canadians might tire of being on the losing side of that imbalance and seek out radical change? Despite being against Alberta separation, if the choice was between independence and a continuation of things as they are, I’d likely change my position to backing independence, regardless of the cost or the mechanism.

We didn’t get to where we are all of a sudden. It has been decades of straw after straw added to the load. Ten years of Justin Trudeau have done more damage to Canadian unity than any other prime minister in history.

This includes his father who ushered in a Constitution that made the Supreme Court the highest legislative authority in the county, supplanting Parliament itself. It is because of the compounding consequences of these actions that a growing number of Canadians are skeptical that Canada, in its current form, will even exist in 50 years. Who knows, maybe Alberta separatists aren’t acting on delusional self-interest but are seeing the writing on the wall and are just the first to start making their way to the lifeboats.

Darren Pinkoski is a safety officer in the forestry sector and a former community newspaper reporter and editor Alberta Voices is a Edmonton Journal/Calgary Herald project that amplifies Albertans’ thoughts on separation-related issues. Send your opinion, to be considered for publication, to edm-feedback@postmedia.com with the subject line Alberta Voices.

Published
Jul 17, 2026
Updated
Jul 17, 2026
Source
Edmonton Journal
Category
Politics
Read time
3 min
Key facts

Key facts

SectionPolitics
Open
SourceEdmonton Journal
Open
PublishedJul 17, 2026
UpdatedJul 17, 2026

Why this matters locally

This politics story matters locally because it may affect readers, businesses, commuters, families, or public services in British Columbia.

Local impact

BC Post links this item to British Columbia coverage so readers can follow related city updates, weather, traffic, events, and category news in one place.

Timeline

PublishedJul 17, 2026, 11:00 AMThis story was published by BC Post.
ImportedJul 17, 2026, 12:00 PMThe item entered the BC Post source pipeline.
Transparency

Source and credit

BC Post may summarize, organize, and add local context for reader clarity. Original reporting remains with the listed publisher.

Edmonton Journal Published Jul 17, 2026 Imported Jul 17, 2026
Read Original Source
Edmonton Journal Jul 17, 2026
Read Original Source