Technology British Columbia

How Apple and OpenAI Ended Up in Court Is More Bizarre Than You Imagine

The post How Apple and OpenAI Ended Up in Court Is More Bizarre Than You Imagine appeared first on Android Headlines .

How Apple and OpenAI Ended Up in Court Is More Bizarre Than You Imagine
Text to audio Audio version available

The post How Apple and OpenAI Ended Up in Court Is More Bizarre Than You Imagine appeared first on Android Headlines .

Apple’s massive trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI got incredibly messy before it even hit the courtroom, all thanks to a highly embarrassing email blunder by the firm’s own legal team. Apple’s official filing claims that the ChatGPT maker completely ignored its February warnings about stolen technology. However, a report by NBC News reveals that negotiations actually collapsed because Apple’s outside counsel mistakenly emailed the wrong person, leading OpenAI’s top lawyer to believe he was being set up.

The core of the multi-billion-dollar dispute At the heart of the lawsuit, filed in an Oakland federal court, is a serious accusation. Apple claims that OpenAI and two former Apple employees, Chang Liu and Tang Tan, systematically stole confidential hardware information. Apple alleges that OpenAI poached these employees to fast-track its own ambitious plans to build consumer hardware devices.

In its official court filing, Apple asserted that it reached out to OpenAI in February to resolve the issue quietly but received zero response. Therefore, this forced them to take legal action. That said, leaked emails tell a completely different story.

The “ghost” phone call that triggered chaos According to the leaked correspondence, Gabriel Gross—an outside attorney representing Apple from the prominent law firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges—did initiate contact. He sent a formal warning to Che Chang, OpenAI’s general counsel, with the subject line “Former Apple employees at OpenAI retaining non-public, confidential, and proprietary information.” The warning was complete with evidence of the alleged theft.

The disaster struck just thirteen minutes later. Gross sent a follow-up email to Chang, thanking him for a phone call that had supposedly just taken place and expressing gratitude for his quick cooperation. Except Gross had never spoken to Chang.

He had actually just finished a phone call with a former Apple employee now working at OpenAI, whose last name is Wang. Gross had emailed both Chang and Wang moments earlier, but when replying to confirm the phone conversation, he accidentally clicked on Chang’s email thread instead of Wang’s (via AppleInsider). Broken trust and total silence Receiving a paper trail for a phone call he never had made OpenAI’s general counsel immediately suspicious.

He believed Apple’s high-priced legal team was fabricating interactions to build a false case against his company. So, Chang fired off an angry message to Apple’s in-house attorneys. He accused Gross of lying, stating flatly, “I don’t know who he is and we have never spoken.”

Chang also demanded Gross be kicked off the case. Although Apple’s in-house team quickly apologized for the sloppy copy-paste error, the professional trust was completely shattered. Talks dried up immediately after the incident, and both sides stopped communicating entirely until Apple formally filed its lawsuit.

The post How Apple and OpenAI Ended Up in Court Is More Bizarre Than You Imagine appeared first on Android Headlines .

Published
Jul 15, 2026
Updated
Jul 15, 2026
Source
Androidheadlines
Category
Technology
Read time
2 min
Key facts

Key facts

SectionTechnology
Open
SourceAndroidheadlines
Open
PublishedJul 15, 2026
UpdatedJul 15, 2026

Why this matters locally

This technology story matters locally because it may affect readers, businesses, commuters, families, or public services in British Columbia.

Local impact

BC Post links this item to British Columbia coverage so readers can follow related city updates, weather, traffic, events, and category news in one place.

Timeline

PublishedJul 15, 2026, 2:58 PMThis story was published by BC Post.
ImportedJul 15, 2026, 6:01 PMThe item entered the BC Post source pipeline.
UpdatedJul 15, 2026, 6:01 PMThe article record or local context was updated.
Transparency

Source and credit

BC Post may summarize, organize, and add local context for reader clarity. Original reporting remains with the listed publisher.

Androidheadlines Published Jul 15, 2026 Imported Jul 15, 2026
Read Original Source
Androidheadlines Jul 15, 2026
Read Original Source