Politics British Columbia

Judge blocks South Dakota abortion advertising ban against nonprofit

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) — South Dakota cannot enforce its abortion advertising ban against a reproductive health nonprofit, a federal judge ruled Friday. U.S. District Judge Camela C. Theeler issued a preliminary injunct…

Judge blocks South Dakota abortion advertising ban against nonprofit
Text to audio Audio version available

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) — South Dakota cannot enforce its abortion advertising ban against a reproductive health nonprofit, a federal judge ruled Friday. U.S. District Judge Camela C. Theeler issued a preliminary injunction blocking South Dakota from enforcing the recently adopted state law against New York-based Mayday Health and plaintiff Nancy Turbak Berry. The judge [...]

Elevate your local knowledge Sign up for the iNFOnews newsletter today! Elevate your local knowledge Sign up for the iNFOnews newsletter today! Select Region Selecting your primary region ensures you get the stories that matter to you first.

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) — South Dakota cannot enforce its abortion advertising ban against a reproductive health nonprofit, a federal judge ruled Friday. U.S. District Judge Camela C. Theeler issued a preliminary injunction blocking South Dakota from enforcing the recently adopted state law against New York-based Mayday Health and plaintiff Nancy Turbak Berry. The judge said the nonprofit was likely to win the case.

Signed in March, the law prohibits the distribution and for unlawful abortion services, like abortion pills, in South Dakota. Friday’s ruling does not strike down the law. The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in May against Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden and Attorney General Marty Jackley, arguing the abortion advertising ban violates freedom of speech.

In the Friday ruling, the judge wrote that the state did not attempt to prove the law met strict scrutiny — that the law both served a compelling government interest and was narrowly tailored. “Information should not be banned,” said Jim Leach, the attorney representing Mayday Health. “And the state wants to ban information about abortion.

This ruling says the state cannot ban information about abortion, no matter what you think about abortion or anything else.” Abortion has been illegal in South Dakota since the reversal of Roe v. Wade, except in cases where the life of the pregnant person is at risk. Administering, prescribing or procuring an abortion in the state is a felony offense.

Mayday Health, which was formed in 2022, advertises about the legality and availability of abortion pills, but it does not sell or distribute any medication. It advertised abortion pills in South Dakota in December 2025 through placards at gas stations that read, “Pregnant? Don’t want to be?

Learn More at Mayday. Health.” Jackley then filed a complaint against Mayday Health for the s, and the two reached an agreement in March for the nonprofit to remove the placards.

Rhoden said in a statement Friday that he was disappointed with the ruling but noted that it is only a preliminary decision. “I remain confident that our law is not only constitutional — it’s vitally important,” he said. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Want to share your thoughts, add context, or connect with others in your community?

Published
Jul 17, 2026
Updated
Jul 17, 2026
Source
Infonews.ca
Category
Politics
Read time
2 min
Key facts

Key facts

SectionPolitics
Open
SourceInfonews.ca
Open
PublishedJul 17, 2026
UpdatedJul 17, 2026

Why this matters locally

This politics story matters locally because it may affect readers, businesses, commuters, families, or public services in British Columbia.

Local impact

BC Post links this item to British Columbia coverage so readers can follow related city updates, weather, traffic, events, and category news in one place.

Timeline

PublishedJul 17, 2026, 4:13 PMThis story was published by BC Post.
ImportedJul 17, 2026, 6:00 PMThe item entered the BC Post source pipeline.
UpdatedJul 17, 2026, 6:00 PMThe article record or local context was updated.
Transparency

Source and credit

BC Post may summarize, organize, and add local context for reader clarity. Original reporting remains with the listed publisher.

Infonews.ca Published Jul 17, 2026 Imported Jul 17, 2026
Read Original Source
Infonews.ca Jul 17, 2026
Read Original Source